Nilsson v. Latimer
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Steele Hays, Justice.
Marcella Nilsson, appellant, and Howard Latimer, appellee, are landowners having a common boundary — the Little Cossatot River and Mill Slough. Nilsson sought a declaratory judgment to interpret the language of the deed of each party and to determine their respective rights to the stream bed, contending that Latimer was not a riparian owner. Each owner also claimed damages from the other for unreasonable uses of the water. The Chancellor found Latimer to be a riparian owner and that neither party had made unreasonable use of the water. On appeal, we affirm.
Nilsson’s land…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Little v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Harris v. BrooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
- Gill v. HedgecockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Kilgo v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Person v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mikel v. HubbardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Burnham v. City of FarmingtonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Crum v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- Town of Newfane v. WalkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Nilsson v. LatimerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.