Legal Opinion

Crum v. James

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 23, 2010No. CA 09-1203PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COURTNEY HUDSON HENRY, Judge.

| ,The Arkansas County Circuit Court established appellant John Crum’s boundaries along two sections of Crooked Creek in Arkansas County and declared that his neighbors, appellees James -and Patricia Craig, made reasonable use of the creek water. For reversal, appellant contends that the court’s decisions were clearly erroneous. We agree with appellant as to one of the boundary lines and reverse and remand on that point. We affirm the remainder of the circuit court’s order.

I. Background facts

Crooked Creek is a large, non-navigable stream that cuts a winding course…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harris v. BrooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  2. Boyster v. ShoemakeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Gill v. HedgecockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  4. Kilgo v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. Person v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Arkansas Elder Outreach of Little Rock, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  2. Arkansas Elder Outreach of Little Rock, Inc. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Horton v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Carnell v. Arkansas Elder Outreach of Little Rock, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  5. Huber Rental Properties, LLC v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API