Legal Opinion

Mikel v. Hubbard

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 23, 1994No. 93-755PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Plaintiff Doris Mikel alleged defendant Hubbard Marine wrongfully occupied her land on the east side of the Poteau River. The jury returned a defendant’s verdict, and a judgment was accordingly entered. We affirm the judgment.

The interesting facts of this case are as follows. In 1820, 1825, and 1830, Congress ratified the Treaty of Doak’s Stand, the Treaty of Washington, D. C., and the Treaty at Dancing Rabbit Creek with the Choctaw Indian Nation. These treaties placed title to land that was west of the western boundary of Arkansas in the Choctaw Indian Nation. At…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wicks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Choctaw Nation v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Firstbank of Arkansas v. KeelingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Carton v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Caplener v. Bluebonnet Milling Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Quinney v. PittmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Little Rock Wastewater Utility v. Larry Moyer Trucking, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Esry v. CardenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Maddox v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API