Legal Opinion
Haynes v. Navy Federal Credit Union
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 12, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-0614PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiff James R. Haynes (“Haynes” or “Plaintiff’) brings this action pro se against Defendant Navy Federal Credit Union (“NCFU” or “Defendant”), asserting a variety of claims arising out of a home mortgage loan extended to him by NCFU. Currently before the Court are Defendant’s [64] Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs [67] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and Defendant’s [79] Motion to Amend Response to Plaintiffs Request for Admission. Upon consideration of the pleadings 1 , the relevant legal authorities, and the record as a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Westmoreland v. Triumph Motorcycle Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1976
- Haynes v. Navy Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Rabil v. SwaffordDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
- Davis v. NoufalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Baker v. PotterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Janet K. Sanford v. Walter DudleyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
- Dew v. Tallulah Water CoDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2021
- Seo v. OhDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Trustees of the Iam National Pension Fund v. M & K Employee Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023