Legal Opinion
Baker v. Potter
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 10, 2002No. Civ.A. No. 00-0786 (RMU)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Denying the Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Withdraw Admissions and Substitute Late-Filed Response
I. INTRODUCTION
This case presents the classic situation in which the application of a rule of federal civil procedure will have a substantive impact on the underlying litigation. John E. Potter,1 named in his official capacity as Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service (“the defendant” or “Postal Service”), asks the court for leave to withdraw matters that, by operation of Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, are deemed admitted…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kerry Steel, Inc. v. Paragon Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Donald Barth v. Bruce S. Gelb, Director, United States Information AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Michael Perez v. Miami-Dade CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Ollie B. Hadley, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Brook Village North Associates v. General Electric Company, Re-Entry and Environmental Systems DivisionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Essroc Cement Corp. v. CTI/D.C., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Centrifugal Acquisition Corp. v. MoonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010
- Haynes v. Navy Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Clark v. US Bank National AssociationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
- Daniels v. Chugach Government Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.