Legal Opinion

Seo v. Oh

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 26, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-0785Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KANG KYU SEO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 18-785 (RDM) CHARLES MOON SUK OH, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Courts must, at times, balance the judicial interest in requiring timely compliance with discovery schedules and the judicial interest in deciding cases on the merits. This is such a case. Plaintiffs are four former employees of Charlie’s Corner, a liquor store located in Washington, D.C. Dkt. 1 at 1–2 (Compl.). They allege that the store is owned by Defendants Charles Moon Suk Oh and Wade Road Inc. and that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Michael Perez v. Miami-Dade CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Michael J. Conlon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Selma Smith v. First National Bank of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Richard Prusia, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Richard PrusiaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. Raiser v. Utah CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API