Durant v. Stahlin
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
Before us are orders granting 4 identical motions for summary judgment. Such motions were filed by 4 of a greater number of correspondingly charged defendants. They were submitted and decided under the invoked shelter of GCR 1963, 117, formerly Court Rule No 30 (1945), in an action ex delicto. That such orders were entered in a suit for damages suffered on account of an alleged conspiratorial tort is specially accented. Such accent will pinpoint a precedent which, according to view of those whose signatures appear below, should be recorded.
Each motion was supported by an affidavit sworn to by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- International Shoe Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Sonnentheil v. Christian Moerlein Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Durant v. StahlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- McCann v. MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Galli v. KirkebyMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Opdyke Investment v. NORRIS GRAIN COMPANYMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Wynn v. ColeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.