Legal Opinion
International Shoe Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 6, 1930No. 42PublishedCited by 147 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland
This w:as a proceeding instituted by complaint of the Federal Trade Commission against petitioner charging a violation of § 7 of the Clayton Act, c. 323, 38 Stat. 730, 731 (U. S. C., Title 15, § 18), which provides:
“No corporation engaged in commerce shall acquire, directly or indirectly, the whole or any part of the stock or other share capital of another corporation engaged also in commerce, where the effect of such acquisition may be to substantially lessen competition between the corporation whose stock is so acquired and the corporation making the acquisition, or to restrain such…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- United States v. United States Steel CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane-Houston Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Federal Trade Commission v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Industrial Assn. of San Francisco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by147 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- White Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.