Legal Opinion

Galli v. Kirkeby

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1976No. 57159, (Calendar No. 8)PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, C. J.

We concur in the remand to the trial court for further proceedings.

The defendants do not enjoy immunity. The day-to-day operation of a school is not a governmental function.

Levin and Fitzgerald, JJ., concurred with Kavanagh, C. J. Williams, J.

This case requires us to revisit our recent governmental immunity decisions in Thomas v Department of State Highways, 398 Mich 1; 247 NW2d 530 (1976), and McCann v Michigan, 398 Mich 65; 247 NW2d 521 (1976).

I. Facts

The case arises out of the alleged repeated homosexual attacks upon a minor student by a school principal. The question involved herein is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Thomas v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. McCann v. MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Pittman v. City of TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Buckeye Union Fire Insurance v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. MacK v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Smith v. Department of Public HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Hyde v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Hopkins v. Spring Independent School Dist.Texas Supreme Court · 1987

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API