Legal Opinion

Polner v. Arling Realty Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLivingston, J.

This case has been submitted to the court upon an agreed statement of facts. Plaintiff seeks to restrain defendant, the owner of premises 1 Grace Court, Brooklyn, New York, from interfering in any manner whatsoever with the operation of a certain automatic coin-metered washing machine owned by plaintiff and installed in the above-mentioned premises.

*832On January 3, 1948, plaintiff entered into a written agreement with the Sonrick Bealty Corporation, defendant’s predecessor in title, whereby plaintiff leased from Sonrick certain specific cellar space for the exclusive use of coin-meteréd laundry…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wash-O-Matic Laundry Co. v. 621 Lefferts Avenue Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Rochester Poster Advertising Co. v. SmithersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  3. Halpern v. SilverCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946
  4. Polner v. Arling Realty Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Brooklyn Dock & Terminal Co. v. BahrenburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dime Laundry Service, Inc. v. 230 Apartments Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1983
  2. United Coin Meter Co v. GibsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Bodden v. CarbonellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. Reliable Washer Service v. Delmar AssociatesLong Beach City Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API