Legal Opinion
Halpern v. Silver
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided October 18, 1946PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoneparth, J.
Motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first cause of action under rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice, upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
In the first cause of action, plaintiff alleges the following: On or about December 6, 1945, he, and one David New-mark, entered into “ an agreement of lease.” A copy of the agreement is annexed to the complaint, and made a part of it. Newmark was at the time the owner of a certain building. By said agreement Newmark, described therein as the landlord, granted “ permission ” to the plaintiff to install and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Greeff v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Clark v. . DevoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Reynolds v. . Van BeurenNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Crosdale v. . LaniganNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Schoonmaker v. HeckscherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Feder v. CaliguiraNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Dressler v. IsaacsOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Wash-O-Matic Laundry Co. v. 621 Lefferts Avenue Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. HorowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Ulan v. Vend-A-Coin, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.