Legal Opinion
Polner v. Arling Realty Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 1949PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWalsh, J.
Plaintiff moves for an order restraining the defendant, who is now the owner of premises 1 Grace Court, Brooklyn, New York, from interfering in any manner whatsoever with the operation of a certain automatic washing machine installed and owned by the plaintiff.
*599Plaintiff alleges that on January 3, 1948, it entered into a written agreement with the Sonrik Realty Corp., defendant’s predecessor in title, whereby plaintiff leased from Sonrik certain specific cellar space for the exclusive use of coin-metered laundry equipment. Defendant does not deny that it notified plaintiff to vacate the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rochester Poster Advertising Co. v. SmithersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Halpern v. SilverCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946
- Stevens v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Brooklyn Dock & Terminal Co. v. BahrenburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- The Brooklyn Dock and Terminal Company v. . BahrenburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sproul v. GilbertOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Dime Laundry Service, Inc. v. 230 Apartments Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1983
- Unique Laundry Corp. v. Hudson Park NY LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Bodden v. CarbonellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Polner v. Arling Realty Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.