Legal Opinion
Dime Laundry Service, Inc. v. 230 Apartments Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 4, 1983PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Alan Saks, J.
The issue before the court is whether the automatic renewal clause in a contract to supply and service coin-metered laundry equipment to the owner of a building is governed by section 5-903 of the General Obligations Law. If the statute applies, the clause is inoperative in the absence of prior notice by plaintiff to the building owner, calling its attention to the clause. Plaintiff, Dime Laundry Service, Inc. (Dime), is seeking a preliminary injunction restraining defendants from removing its equipment from the laundry room in defendants’ basement and a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of N.Y. World-Telegram Corp. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Wash-O-Matic Laundry Co. v. 621 Lefferts Avenue Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948
- Kaypar Corp. v. Fosterport Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1947
- Halpern v. SilverCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946
- Polner v. Arling Realty Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Clean Corp. v. FostonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Nextel of New York, Inc. v. Time Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Donald Rubin, Inc. v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Linro Equipment Corp. v. Westage Tower AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Allstate Insurance v. Chia-I LungNew York Supreme Court · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.