Legal Opinion

State v. Whitmore

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1933No. 23483, 23484 and 23485PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

These cases involve substantially

tbe same questions of law and were submitted together on exceptions of tbe prosecuting attorney of Lucas county, Ohio, to tbe ruling and judgment of tbe court of common pleas on demurrer to the indictment in cause No. 23485, and on motions to quash the indictments in eases Nos. 23483 and 23484.

The constitutionality of Section 13446-4, General Code, is attacked in all the cases. This section reads as follows:

“If the supreme court is of the opinion that the questions presented by such hill of exceptions should be decided, it shall allow the hill of exceptions to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Trustees of Brimfield v. Commissioners of PortageOhio Supreme Court · 1840
  3. Breinig v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State v. KassayOhio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. PetroOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State v. LindwayOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Eastman v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Hammond v. BrownDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1971
  5. State v. ChildersOhio Supreme Court · 1938

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API