Legal Opinion
State v. Kassay
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 1932No. 22990PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This proceeding comes to this court upon exceptions by the prosecuting attorney of Summit county to a decision of the court of common pleas of Summit county, on application of the prosecuting attorney for permission to file a bill of exceptions in this court.
The judgment of the court of common pleas was entered in a felony case in that court sustaining a demurrer to an indictment, upon the ground that Paul F. Kassay was indicted under favor of Sections 13421-23 and 13421-24, General Code, and that said sections are unconstitutional.
The application was allowed, and thereafter a motion was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Patterson v. Colorado Ex Rel. Attorney General of Colo.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Frohwerk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- City of Cleveland v. TrzebuckowskiOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Eastwood Mall, Inc. v. SlancoOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Eastman v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. WhitmoreOhio Supreme Court · 1933
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.