Legal Opinion

General Electric Co. v. Southern Ry.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 28, 1905PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Before Purdy, J., Richland, December, 1904. Action by General Electric Company against Southern Railway. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cite. If original contract is carried out in delivery of goods, no harm is done plaintiff: 8 A. & E. R. R. Cas., N. S. 380; 36 S. W., 396; 13 Cyc., 170, note 67. cite: Defendant is liable for goods: 25 S. C., 226 ; 3 Wood’s Daw, 1594; 8 Phil., 19 ; 29 Wis., 611.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Pope.

This is an action by the plaintiff, a corporation under the laws of the State of New York, against the defendant, a corporation under the laws of Virginia, but domesticated in South Carolina, for the recovery of the sum of $230.57. The contest grew, out of a motor of the value of $230.57, transported from Schenectady, N. Y., to Columbia, S. C. The bill of lading was to the order of the General Electric Company, notify Cotton States Electric and Machine Co>. This bill of lading, together with a draft attached thereto', was drawn…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Conard v. Atlantic Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Dows v. National Exchange Bank of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. The ThamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Cogswell v. CannadySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. AylorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
  4. The Seneca Co. v. CrenshawSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  5. First National Bank v. Tchula Commercial Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API