Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Tchula Commercial Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1923No. 22986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.

These cases originated by attachment and garnishment based upon claims of shortages in weights of certain purchasers of hay by the appellees from the Southwestern Grain Company of Ripley, Tenn., and shipped to the appellees, purchasers, at Tchula, Holmes county, Miss., with bill of lading attached to draft, “Shipper’s Order Notify,” through the First National Bank of Ripley, Tenn., and the Merchants’ & Planters’ Bank at Tchula, Miss., and the cases were tried on an agreed statement of facts in the circuit court of Holmes county, where judgments were rendered in favor of the appellees,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. J. F. French & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. United States v. FergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Searles Bros. v. Smith Grain Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stacey-Vorwerk Co. v. BuckWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Liberty Central Trust Co. v. SentonMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Piqua Sav. Bank v. Copiah Hardware Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API