Legal Opinion

Duhamel v. Multiple Listing Service of Dutchess County, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph D. Quinn, Jr., J.

At issue is whether the parties have presented this court with a live controversy in seeking declarations as to whether, on conceded facts, a by-law of defendant, a voluntary, domestic, not-for-profit corporation formed by real estate brokers engaged in business in Dutchess County, limiting the type of signs which may be displayed upon properties listed for sale, violates section 340 of the General Business Law, the so-called Donnelly Act, New York’s antitrust law. The issue is tendered to the court in an agreed statement of facts.

The seven…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. Mobil Oil Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Optivision, Inc. v. Syracuse Shopping Center AssociatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1979
  3. Columbia Gas of New York, Inc. v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Grillo v. Bd. of Realtors of Plainfield AreaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  5. Barns v. Dairymen's League Cooperative Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sheet Metal Workers Local 441 Health & Welfare Plan v. Glaxosmithkline, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Bernstein v. 1995 AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Atkin v. Union Processing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Cantor v. Multiple Listing Service of Dutchess County, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  5. O'Riordan v. Long Island Board of Realtors, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API