Legal Opinion
Cantor v. Multiple Listing Service of Dutchess County, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 25, 1983No. 81 Civ. 2183 (JES)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Paul W. Cantor and Charles Gilbride, licensed real estate brokers, commenced this antitrust action against the Multiple Listing Service of Dutchess County, Inc. (“MLS”), a not-for-profit corporation of which they are member-brokers, alleging that various MLS bylaws which restrict their right to post “Century 21” lawn signs on property listed with MLS violate sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1-2 (1976), and sections 340 and 349 of the New York General Business Law, N.Y.Gen.Bus.Law §§ 340, 349 (McKinney 1968 & Supp.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Realcomp II, Ltd. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Colorado Springs Board of Realtors, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Kaufman v. BDO SeidmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Gribben v. Lucky Star Ranch Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
- Kaufman v. Bdo SeidmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.