Legal Opinion

Eichelberger v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 2004No. WD 62785PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Presiding Judge.

Bertrand Eichelberger appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for ineffective assistance of counsel. Eichelberger claims he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to call certain character witnesses at the sentencing hearing held after Eichelberger pled guilty. Because we do not find the motion court’s findings and conclusions to be clearly erroneous, we affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

On August 9, 1999, Bertrand Eichelber-ger entered an Alford plea of guilty on one count of first-degree statutory sodomy, section…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. Leisure v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. State v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cherco v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Rush v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Roberts v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. West v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Hewitt v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API