Legal Opinion
Rush v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 29, 2012No. ED 97300PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARY M. GAERTNER JR., Judge.
Introduction
Andrew Rush, Jr., (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 1 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
Background
On October 20, 2004, Movant pled guilty to one count of possession of a controlled substance, a class C felony. The State recommended a suspended execution of a three-year sentence, with probation for three years. Movant requested a suspended imposition of his sentence, which the plea court granted, and the court placed him on probation for three years.
On May 9, 2007, the plea court suspended Movant’s probation after…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Glover v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Washington v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Haddock v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Routt v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Kulhanek v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Durant v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.