Legal Opinion

Hewitt v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 2017No. SD 34409PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY W. LYNCH, P.J.-OPINION AUTHOR

Joshua Daniel Hewitt (“Movant”) timely appeals the motion court’s denial of his amended Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.1 In the underlying criminal cases giving rise to his amended motion, he was charged with tampering with a motor vehicle, in violation of section 569.080, and forgery, in violation of section 570.090.2 On July 17, 2012, Movant pleaded guilty to both charges and his plea was accepted by the plea court. The plea court acknowledged Movant’s plea agreement with the State that specified that he would be sentenced to four years in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Luleff v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Charles K. Moore v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  3. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. Price v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  5. Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bearden v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  2. Prine v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. BILLIE J. BORSCHNACK, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Henry L. Ward v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025
  5. Hewitt v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API