Legal Opinion

Austin v. Tire Treads, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1974No. 7425DC84PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant argues that his motion for a directed verdict should have been granted. We agree. Although personal liability may be imposed on a corporate officer for fraudulently misrepresenting a company’s financial condition to one dealing with the company provided that party suffers a loss as a result of reliance on the misrepresentation involved, see Mills Co. v. Earle, 233 N.C. 74, 62 S.E. 2d 492, plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case. Actionable misrepresentation consists of (1) a representation of a material fact, (2) which was false, (3) which was either known to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cofield v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Childress v. NordmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Nunn v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Lillian Knitting Mills Co. v. EarleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Tractor & Auto Supply Co. v. Fayetteville Tractor & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Winburn v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Griffin v. CanadaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Gunther v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Horizon Forest Prods., L.P. v. Flowers Flooring, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API