Legal Opinion

Winburn v. Insurance Co. of North America

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 30, 1985No. 0596PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

This is an action for fraud and negligence. The trial court granted the motion of the respondent Insurance Company of North America (INA) for an involuntary nonsuit and the motion of the respondent G. Pinckney Darby for a directed verdict. Charles Winburn appeals. The questions on appeal concern the sufficiency of the evidence as to Winburn’s causes of action for fraud and for negligence and the admission and exclusion of certain evidence. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for new trial.

I. Sufficiency of Evidence

We deal first with the issue of whether the trial…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Nichols v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  2. Roundtree Villas Assoc., Inc. v. KINGS CORP.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Crowley Ex Rel. Estate of Crowley v. SpiveyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Gordon-Gallup Realtors, Inc. v. Cincinnati InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  5. Cudd v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Sauner v. Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Gilliland v. Elmwood PropertiesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  3. South Carolina State Ports Authority v. Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  4. AMA Management Corp. v. StrasburgerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Sherer v. JamesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API