Legal Opinion

Lillian Knitting Mills Co. v. Earle

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1950No. 594PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEbviN, J.

There is undoubtedly a misjoinder both of parties plaintiff and of causes of action where two or more persons having distinct causes of action against the same defendants join as plaintiffs in one suit. G.S. 1-127, 1-132; Roberts v. Mfg. Co., 181 N.C. 204, 106 S.E. 664.

But such is not the case at bar. The objection that there is a misjoinder of parties plaintiff lacks substance, for the very simple reason that the Lillian Knitting Mills Company is the sole party plaintiff.

Tbe contentions tbat there is a misjoinder of canses of action and that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Solomon v. . BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Roberts v. Utility Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Houston v. . ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Tate v. BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Tate v. . BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Swenson v. ThibautCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Keener Lumber Co., Inc. v. PerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Van Dam Egg Co. v. Allendale Farms, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  4. Branch v. Board of Education of Robeson CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Angell v. KellyDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API