Gunther v. Parker
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Plaintiff appellants contend that the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. We agree.
Judge Arnold, speaking for our Court in Freeman v. Development Co., 25 N.C. App. 56, 59, 212 S.E. 2d 190 (1975), noted the general rule that “[i]n considering a motion for directed verdict, the court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, giving to it the benefit of all reasonable inferences and resolving all inconsistencies in its favor. . . . The motion should be granted only if, as a matter of law, the evidence is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Freeman v. STURDIVANT DEVELOPMENT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Jenkins v. HawthorneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Goff v. FRANK A. WARD REALTY & INSURANCE CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- May Ex Rel. May v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Austin v. Tire Treads, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974