Legal Opinion

Gunther v. Parker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1976No. 7528DC937Published

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Plaintiff appellants contend that the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. We agree.

Judge Arnold, speaking for our Court in Freeman v. Development Co., 25 N.C. App. 56, 59, 212 S.E. 2d 190 (1975), noted the general rule that “[i]n considering a motion for directed verdict, the court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, giving to it the benefit of all reasonable inferences and resolving all inconsistencies in its favor. . . . The motion should be granted only if, as a matter of law, the evidence is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Freeman v. STURDIVANT DEVELOPMENT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Jenkins v. HawthorneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Goff v. FRANK A. WARD REALTY & INSURANCE CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. May Ex Rel. May v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Austin v. Tire Treads, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API