Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Canada

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 21, 1976No. 7518DC958Published

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

The plaintiffs assign error to the judge’s dismissal of their claim for fraud against the defendant. It is well established in this jurisdiction that in an action for fraud arising from an express representation, the plaintiff must establish six essential elements: (1) That defendant made a representation relating to some material past or existing fact; (2) that the representation was false; (3) that when he made it, defendant knew that the representation was false, or made it recklessly, without any knowledge of its truth and as a positive assertion; (4) that defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Austin v. Tire Treads, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API