Legal Opinion

Courviosier v. Burger

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1923No. Civ. No. 2393PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBubnett, J.

The action was for damages caused by the alleged negligent operation of an automobile by defendant whereby plaintiff was run over and severely injured and she was awarded á verdict of three thousand dollars by the trial jury. The appeal is from the judgment entered thereon in her favor. As to the circumstances of the accident, which occurred on Eighth Street, Sacramento, plaintiff testified as follows:

“I was prepared to go to work, and I was going to the Post Office, down K Street, going towards the Post Office. I walked on a straight line from the sidewalk, about the center of K Street. As I…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Scott v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Deputy v. KimmellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Sheldon v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Baker v. . CloseNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Moss v. H. R. Boynton Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Vasic v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  2. Gajanich v. GregoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Maggart v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Lord v. StacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Ducat v. GoldnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API