Maggart v. Bell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
The above-entitled cases were consolidated for the purpose of trial and pursuant to stipulation and order were consolidated for the purpose of appeal. In the trial court judgments were entered upon the verdicts in favor of plaintiffs Sarah J. Maggart and Anna Devany in the sums of $5,000 and $4,000, respectively, for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant. From these judgments defendant appeals.
Appellant first contends that he was prevented from having a fair trial by reason of prejudicial conduct on the part of respondents’ counsel in intimating to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Burgesser v. Bullock'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Girard v. IrvineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Filson v. BalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Richmond v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Binder v. Aetna Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Ridge v. Boulder Creek Union Junior-Senior High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Hurtel v. Albert Cohn, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Pinello v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.