Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided April 9, 2001No. 9:98-cv-00007PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
HANNAH, District Judge.
Came on this day consideration of the bench trial conducted before this Court during the first full week of March, 2001. Having considered the evidence submitted, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any finding of fact more properly characterized as a conclusion of law should be construed as such. Any conclusion of law more properly characterized as a finding of fact should be construed as such.
I. BACKGROUND
Pilgrim’s Pride engages in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Steiner v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Ted L. Lindow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Reich v. IBP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Reich v. Monfort, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Gorman v. Consolidated Edison Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Pirant v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Von Friewalbe v. Boeing Aerospace Operations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Little v. Technical Specialty Products, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2013
- Jordan v. IBP, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2008
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.