Martinovich v. Marsicano
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court."
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an action to quiet title, involving an undivided half of the northeast quarter of the northeast. quarter of section. 10, Township 1 south, range 7 west, San Bernardino base and meridian, in San Bernardino County. From a judgment therein in favor of defendant the plaintiff appeals.
Cerverio Martinovich died testate on February 6, 1889, the owner of the property above described. By the terms of his will, the undivided one half thereof in controversy was devised to his widow, Sophia Martinovich. On December 1, 1897, defendant commenced an action in the superior court of the city and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Martinovich v. MarsicanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Woodward v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Porter v. PicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Wheeler v. FarmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Kesler v. LaphamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McGee v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Bass v. StoddCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Arcturus Manufacturing Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Bank of South San Francisco v. PikeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Street v. ReingkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.