Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Farmer

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1869PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Third District, County of Santa, Cruz. Appeal from the order of the Court refusing to dissolve an injunction. The cáse is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSprague, J.

This appeal is from an order denying appellant’s motion to discharge an attachment. Suit was commenced by plaintiff, and attachment issued on the 14th of May, 1868. Summons was personally served on the defendant on the 14th of May, 1868, and the attachment was duly levied on certain real estate and personal property on the 15th of May, 1868. On the same day (15th of May), defendant served on plaintiff’s attorney a notice, that, on the 20th of May, or as soon thereafter as counsel could be heard, he would apply to the Judge of the Court in which the action was pending, and move to have the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hathaway v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Rogers v. Hosack's ExecutorsNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  3. Wyeth v. StoneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1840

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Welch v. AlcottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. First Nat. Bank v. SwanWyoming Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Hicks v. PostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. De Leonis v. EtchepareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API