Legal Opinion

Bank of South San Francisco v. Pike

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 15, 1921No. Civ. No. 3810PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

Plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants to quiet its title to a tract of land in San Francisco. The trial court gave judgment, among other things, in favor of the defendants Henry S. and Carrie E. Bridge, and from that portion of the judgment the plaintiff has appealed, bringing up the judgment-roll without any bill of exceptions.

The facts material to a consideration of the case are as follows: On April 1, 1910, the American Steel Casting Company, a corporation, and Boaz D. Pike and Georgie S: Pike, executed to plaintiff a one-day note; on April 11, 1911, the plaintiff, commenced…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Brown v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. First National Bank of Los Angeles v. MaxwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Woodward v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Hoag v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Anderson v. GoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bass v. StoddCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. Bird v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Duhart v. O'RourkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Paul v. Palm Springs Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Richion v. MahoneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API