Legal Opinion

Anderson Chevrolet/Olds, Inc. v. Higgins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1982No. 8130DC984PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

No exceptions appear in the record. “[T]he scope of review on appeal is confined to a consideration of those exceptions set out and made the basis of assignments of error in the record . . . .” Rule 10(a), Rules of Appellate Procedure. The rule provides, however, that notwithstanding the absence of exceptions, an appeal duly taken from a final judgment may present for review, if properly raised in the brief, the question of whether the judgment is supported by the findings of fact and conclusions of law. Id. See Swygert v. Swygert, 46 N.C. App. 173, 180-81, 264 S.E. 2d 902,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Snyder v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Pike v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Schloss v. JamisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Swygert v. SwygertCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Grimes v. Sea & Sky Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Routh v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Sealey v. GrineCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API