Legal Opinion

Lea Company v. Narth Carolina Bd. of Transportation

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 4, 1989No. 111PA88PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Justice.

The issue is whether the trial court properly denied plaintiff’s motion, pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 60(b)(6), to reopen a prior judgment for the purpose of making additional findings and conclusions as to whether plaintiff should be awarded compound interest as an element of just compensation for defendant’s taking of an interest in plaintiffs property by inverse condemnation. We hold that it did.

This case is before us for the third time. On the first appeal, we affirmed a judgment that defendant was liable to plaintiff for the taking of a compensable interest in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tennessee-Carolina Transportation, Inc. v. Strick Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Lea Co. v. North Carolina Board of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. D & W, INC. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Collins v. SimmsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Lea Co. v. North Carolina Board of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Epps v. Duke University, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Fid. Bank v. N.C. Dep't of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
  3. In Re SRGCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. Lea Co. v. North Carolina Board of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. In re S.R.G.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API