Legal Opinion
Crider v. Highmark Life Insurance
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided October 16, 2006No. l:05-cv-660PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCOVILLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
This is an action for benefits brought pursuant to the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B). Plaintiff seeks reinstatement of long-term disability (LTD) benefits under a policy of insurance provided by his former employer, Wickes Lumber Company. The policy was written by Trans-General Life Insurance Company, now known as Highmark Life Insurance Company. The insurance policy (AR 345-367) 1 contains all of the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robert M. Wilson v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Angela M. Jones v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Perryman v. Provident Life and Accident Ins. Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 2010
- Bragg v. ABN AMRO North America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- Zenadocchio v. BAE Systems Unfunded Welfare Benefit PlanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Boster v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Conway v. Reliance Standard Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.