Legal Opinion
Perryman v. Provident Life and Accident Ins. Co.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided March 30, 2010No. CV-01-0927-PHX-PGRPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
PAUL G. ROSENBLATT, District Judge.
Plaintiff Nancy Perryman (“Perryman”) brings this action to recover long-term disability benefits she alleges were wrongfully denied her by defendant Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Provident”). The action is before the Court for its de novo review of Provident’s denial of benefits pursuant to the Employment Retirement Security Income Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). Having considered the parties’ memoranda, the evidence of record, and the oral argument of counsel as presented at the bench trial of this action, the Court finds that…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Mary M. MAGALLANES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Donald E. EMBREY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Filarsky v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Bigham v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
- Anderson v. Liberty Mutual Long Term Disability PlanDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
- Bunger v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2016
- Bledsoe v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.