Zenadocchio v. BAE Systems Unfunded Welfare Benefit Plan
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART ZENADOCCHIO’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (Doc. #16); OVERRULING BAE SYSTEMS AND HARTFORD’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (Doc. #12) AND REMANDING THE CASE FOR A FULL AND FAIR EVALUATION
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
This cause arises from the disability of Plaintiff Donna Zenadocchio (“Zenadocchio”). Before becoming disabled, Zenadocchio was employed by BAE Systems North America as a financial analyst and was covered under the Defendant BAE Systems Unfunded Welfare Benefit Plan (“BAE”). In the course of her employment,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Haning v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
- Clayman v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Tobin v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2017
- Cohn v. Western & Southern Financial Group Long Term Incentive and Retention Plan IDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Jalali v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.