Goelet v. Roe
New York Court of Common Pleas
Appeal from. Sixth district court. Action by Robert Goelet and others against Frederick N. Roe and others, tenants and undertenants, for the possession of premises. From a final order denying them possession, plaintiffs appeal. Reversed.
1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.
The unchallenged facts are that on October 16, 1893, the petitioners let the premises 402 Fourth avenue, in the city of New York, to Frederick N. Roe for one year from May 1, 1894, without provision of any kind for a renewal of the lease; that Frederick N. Roe thereupon sublet the premises to the respondent Mary R. Yost for the same period, and covenanted to renew the lease for one year from the expiration of the first; and that in September, 1894, the petitioners let the premises to Adeline Y. Roe, the wife of Frederick N. Roe, for one year, commencing May 1,1895. These proceedings for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mitchell v. . ReedNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Trull v. . GrangerNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- Imbert v. HallockNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1862
- People Ex Rel. Sheridan v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Mechanics' & Traders' Fire Insurance v. ScottNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1859
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Eells v. . MorseNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Cullinan v. GoldsteinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908
- Schlaich v. BlumNew York Supreme Court · 1903
- Eells v. MorseAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910
- Fells v. MorseNew York Supreme Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.