Legal Opinion

Cullinan v. Goldstein

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 15, 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the tenant from a. final order, entered in favor of the landlord in the Municipal Court of the city of New • York, second district, borough of The Bronx.

1Opinion of the CourtMacLean, J.

Apart from the defense set forth in the answer to the petition in this proceeding to dispossess, it appears that the common lessor, a corporation, of the parties herein leased certain premises to one of them, Abraham Goldstein, for a term to commence August 1, 1904, and to end March, 1908; and that it leased the same premises to the other, Patrick Oullinan, for a term to commence March 1, 1908, and to end May 1, 1910. Upon the. expiration of his term, Goldstein remained?; in possession «<, and the petitioner, averring himself to be his landlord, etc., brought this proceeding to dispossess, on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reich v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Evertson v. SuttonNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  3. Imbert v. HallockNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1862
  4. Goelet v. RoeNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eells v. . MorseNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. N. R. M. Garage Corp. v. Morris Feig Garage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  3. Simon v. HermannCity of New York Municipal Court · 1911
  4. Eells v. MorseAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API