Legal Opinion

Schlaich v. Blum

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a final order in summary proceedings of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, first ' district, borough of Manhattan, in favor of the occupants.

1Opinion of the CourtBlajtchard, J.

This is an appeal from a final order of a Municipal Court of the city of Hew York in favor of the occupants, the respondents, in summary proceedings to recover possession of real property. The proceedings were instituted by the petitioner, Schlaich, as agent of the owners of the property under and by virtue of section 2231, subd. 1, of the Code of Civil Procedure. The respondents Blum and Levy are subtenants.

The material facts established by the evidence are as follows: In Hovember, 1900, Mary W. Hamilton, owning a life estate in the premises 455 and 451 Broadway, in the city of Hew York, by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Croft v. KingNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1879
  2. Kelly v. VarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Rodgers v. EarleThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893
  4. Fox v. HeldAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898
  5. Goelet v. RoeNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stephen Estates, Inc. v. KaplanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1950
  2. Reichman v. CraneCity of New York Municipal Court · 1956
  3. Belding Bros. & Co. v. BlumAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904
  4. Irrose Realty Corp. v. Warren-Nash Motor Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API