Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Sheridan v. . Andrews

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 1873PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The magistrate never acquired jurisdiction in the proceedings for the dispossession of Ring, the occupant of the premises claimed by the defendant.

The defendant, as grantee of the tax title, was authorized to institute summary proceedings to recover possession against any person holding in hostility to that title. (Laws 1854, chap. 384, tit. 5, § 33.)

The language of the statute is, that the grantee shall be entitled, "as against all persons whomsoever, to the possession of the premises."

The affidavit presented to the magistrate states that Ring was in possession of the premises, and had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Church v. Supervisors of AlleganyNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  2. Ex parte WestonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  3. Colden v. BottsNew York Supreme Court · 1834
  4. Hallenbeck & Miller v. GarnerNew York Supreme Court · 1838

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Milwaukee Medical College v. ChittendenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Welch v. County Court of Wetzel CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. State ex rel. Enderlin State Bank v. RoseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Hemmer v. BonsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Nelson v. EcklundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API