Legal Opinion

Imbert v. Hallock

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided May 15, 1862PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The plaintiff claimed to recover in this action damages for an alleged trespass committed by the defendants.

1Opinion of the Court

By the court,

Hilton, J.

It appears that in December^ 1859, the plaintiff hired of the defendant Marshall, by *457parol, a back room and bedroom on the third floor of the building 278 Eighth avenue, at the rate of $6.60 per month, payable in advance. In February following, Marshall rented the whole building to the defendant Hallock, from the first of May thereafter, and the plaintiff was notified that her tenancy would then terminate. On the first day of May, the plaintiff still retaining possession of her apartments, Marshall instituted summary proceedings before justice Dusenbury, to remove her,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miller v. BrinkerhoffNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Harman v. BrothersonCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  3. Evertson v. SuttonNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  4. Vosburgh v. WelchNew York Supreme Court · 1814
  5. Sims v. HumphreyNew York Supreme Court · 1847

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pursley v. HayesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  2. Hannan v. DuschSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  3. Eells v. . MorseNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Goelet v. RoeNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  5. Kelly v. SmithNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API