Van Horn v. Pacific Refining & Roofing Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action for damages for personal injuries, and from an order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial.
The first contention of the appellant is that its motion for a nonsuit should have been grantedt The following are the conceded facts of the cause as presented by the evidence in support of the plaintiff’s ease: The defendant is a corpora-' tion which for several years past has been engaged in the manufacture of roofing and other building material in the city of San Francisco. In the month of March, 1912, it entered into a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Judson v. Giant Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. GoldensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- O'Connor v. MennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- White v. SpreckelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Scrivani v. DonderoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- McCloskey Ex Rel. McCloskey v. KoplarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Alexander v. HammarbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Ciacci v. WoolleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1934
- Nungaray v. Pleasant Valley Lima Bean Growers & Warehouse Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.