Legal Opinion
Roden v. AmerisourceBergen Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 14, 2005No. G034444, G034486PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOORE, J.
This is the second time these parties have paid us a visit. The last time, we affirmed a postjudgment order interpreting a judgment that entitled Donald R. Roden (Roden) to collect cash and employment benefits from his former employer, Bergen Brunswig Corporation. (Roden v. Bergen Brunswig Corp. (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 620, 623, 625 [132 Cal.Rptr.2d 549].) Since the order was affirmed, the parties have continued to squabble. Now, they disagree as to whether the court properly entered an order permitting postjudgment discovery. AmerisourceBergen Corporation, successor in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Omaha Indemnity Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Tudor Ranches, Inc. v. State Comp. Ins. FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ramos v. Superior Court of San Francisco Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- MacAluso v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- In re Residential Capital, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Regents of the University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Gerard A. Cruz, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Carmelita C. Cruz, Defendant/Counterclaimant-AppellantSupreme Court of Guam · 2022
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.