Regents of the University of California v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, J.
Evidence Code section 912, subdivision (a), provides that the attorney-client privilege is waived when “without coercion” a holder of the privilege has either disclosed or consented to the disclosure of a significant part of an otherwise privileged communication. In this writ proceeding we consider whether disclosure of privileged communications is free of coercion when, as a matter of policy, the federal government advised corporations under criminal and regulatory investigation that they might avoid indictment or regulatory sanctions if they fully cooperated in the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
- In Re JOHN DOE CORPORATION. JOHN DOE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. RobertsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- In re Chiquita Brands International, Inc. Alien Tort Statute & Shareholder Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2017
- Hooked Media Group, Inc. v. Apple Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Johnson v. Dept. of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.