Legal Opinion

Regents of the University of California v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 2008No. D051364PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENKE, J.

Evidence Code section 912, subdivision (a), provides that the attorney-client privilege is waived when “without coercion” a holder of the privilege has either disclosed or consented to the disclosure of a significant part of an otherwise privileged communication. In this writ proceeding we consider whether disclosure of privileged communications is free of coercion when, as a matter of policy, the federal government advised corporations under criminal and regulatory investigation that they might avoid indictment or regulatory sanctions if they fully cooperated in the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  5. In Re JOHN DOE CORPORATION. JOHN DOE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. RobertsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
  3. In re Chiquita Brands International, Inc. Alien Tort Statute & Shareholder Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2017
  4. Hooked Media Group, Inc. v. Apple Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Johnson v. Dept. of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API