St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. American Home Assurance Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMallett, J.
This is an action among three insurance companies: St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Continental Casualty Company, plaintiffs-appellants, and American Home Assurance Company, defendant-appellee. In this consolidated appeal, we granted leave to decide the legal effect to be given plaintiff-appellants’ pro-rata "other insurance” clause and defendant-appellee’s excess "other insurance” clause contained in their respective malpractice insurance policies.
More specifically, we must determine whether to adopt the Lamb-Weston doctrine 1 that views all "other insurance” clauses as…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. ChurchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Upjohn Co. v. New Hampshire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Group Insurance v. CzopekMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Federal Kemper Insurance v. Health Insurance Administration, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- John Michael McGow v. Billy Joe McCurryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- King v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Gelman Sciences, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Federal Insurance Company v. The Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection And Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Zurich-American Insurance v. Amerisure InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.