Legal Opinion

Gelman Sciences, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1998No. Docket 105981, 106678PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallett, C.J.

We granted leave in these consolidated cases to determine whether the Court of Appeals properly adopted the “manifestation trigger theory” to deny coverage under standard comprehensive general liability and umbrella excess insurance policies allegedly issued by the defendant insurers. The policies essentially provided coverage for an “occurrence” taking place within the policy period. Plaintiffs sought coverage for expenses relating to environmental clean-up actions where the contamination was discovered years after the policy periods had expired, but where it allegedly occurred while the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. New Hampshire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Powers v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Stine v. Continental Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  5. American Bumper and Manufacturing Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Don's Building Supply, Inc. v. Onebeacon Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Tenneco Inc. v. Amerisure Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Utica Mutual Ins. Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Arco Industries Corp. v. American Motorists InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API