Legal Opinion

Group Insurance v. Czopek

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1992No. 90390, (Calendar No. 11)PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallett, J.

This is an action for declaratory judgment, seeking to determine the insurer’s obligation to defend or indemnify its insured for his liability for injuries he inflicted upon two police officers when he resisted arrest.

We are called upon to consider whether the injuries caused by defendant Arthur Smith’s assault on two police officers constituted an "occurrence” as required by plaintiff’s homeowner’s policy. We also consider whether intoxication can turn an intentional act into an accidental one under the insurance policy language.

I

On New Year’s Eve, 1983, eighteen-year-old Arthur Smith went…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Powers v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Fireman's Fund Ins. Companies v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
  4. Guerdon Industries, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Eghotz v. CreechMichigan Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Henderson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Terrien v. ZwitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. NikkelMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Heniser v. Frankenmuth Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. MastersMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API