Legal Opinion
King v. Ford Motor Credit Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided August 20, 2003No. Docket 233931PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFort Hood, J.
Defendants 1 appeal by leave granted from the trial court’s order granting in part and denying in part cross-motions for summary disposition. We reverse and remand for entry of an order granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition and denying plaintiffs’ motion for summary disposition.
I. BASIC FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiffs filed a class action complaint, and demand for a jury trial alleging violations of the Michigan Motor Vehicle Sales Finance Act (mvsfa), MCL 492.101 et seq., and a violation of the Michigan Consumer Protection Act (mcpa), MCL 445.901 et seq. In 1997,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- DiBenedetto v. West Shore HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Marquis v. Hartford Accident & IndemnityMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Bradley v. Saranac Community Schools Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Cruz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- E. Stephen Dean v. Thomas K. ByerleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Taylor v. CurrieMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- City of Fraser v. Almeda UniversityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- Klida v. BramanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Lake Isabella Development, Inc v. Village of Lake IsabellaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.